Topics in this edition of our mailbag include several draft questions, where Trevor Zegras might be playing next year, and much more. If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in our mailbag from last weekend. There will be one more that runs this weekend.
UncleMike1526: Who should be the one player, be it trade, UFA signing, or RFA signing the Blackhawks should target this offseason?
I’ll go with Jake Guentzel here. Not only is he one of the top free agents available but he doesn’t cost anything but cap space to bring in. (Unless Chicago were to trade for his negotiating rights, then it’d be a mid-round pick which isn’t a big deal for them.) They’re at the point now where they need to start adding pieces and while he alone won’t turn around their fortunes for next season, getting a quality scorer for free (or close to it) would be great.
I also put some value in the success he had with Sidney Crosby. It’s not as easy as some think to keep up with elite players so finding someone that could ride shotgun with Connor Bedard isn’t as easy as it seems. Getting someone who has spent the majority of the last several years in that type of role would be the perfect fit to work with Bedard. It might not be an easy sell considering there will be plenty of playoff-contending teams that will have interest but that would be a great outcome for them.
You mention an RFA signing in your question but an offer sheet would not be advisable for them. If they’re signing someone of consequence, it’s going to cost them at least one first-round pick. Those picks are unprotected and considering that one player alone isn’t going to make a big difference, I’m not sure they should be running the risk of losing what could be a fairly high lottery pick a year from now.
jminn: If Chicago takes Artyom Levshunov second overall, who do you think the Ducks will take? They’ve said they need both a right-handed defenseman and a right-handed wing. Do they attempt to get that at number three or take the guy they think is the best available player even though they’re loaded with left-handed defenders?
If it’s me in charge, I’d go with Ivan Demidov. There is a bit of risk considering he was playing at a lower level but he might be the most skilled player left on the board. Anaheim is still at a point where they should be looking to add firepower to their quickly improving forward group and getting a possible front-line winger to go with their young centers would be great.
But it’s not me in charge, it’s Pat Verbeek. He has certainly put an emphasis on size and grit and Anton Silayev could be that type of unicorn defender that rarely comes around. Even though he doesn’t have the offensive upside that several other blueliners do, players with his profile that can play at a high level don’t come around too often.
Yes, the Ducks have ample left-side depth on the back end. But they don’t have anyone like Silayev. He’s someone who could be that key shutdown defender who kills penalties and plays in late-game defensive situations, basically being the perfect complementary piece to Pavel Mintyukov and Olen Zellweger on the left side. Watching these playoffs, Silayev could be a significant difference-maker and that’s why I think they’ll view him as the BPA and add him to their already-deep prospect pool.
GBear: Draft question!
Assuming the Preds are looking for a forward who is a drive-the-play type player, who would you be looking at as likely available at the #22 spot at the draft? I’m leaning towards Sacha Boisvert, fwiw.
This is probably a good time for my annual reminder that I’m not a scout by any stretch of the imagination so I’m relying solely on second-hand info as a result. Boisvert seems like a good fit in that range. I wonder about Igor Chernyshov falling into that range as well. He has that power forward-type of profile but we’ve seen some Russian-born players slip in recent years and if he does, he could fall into Nashville’s laps.
I don’t know if he necessarily fits the profile you’re hoping for but the other player that comes to mind for them if they’re going for a forward is Andrew Basha. He is a bit smaller but is a strong puck carrier who could drive the play while being an all-situations player. He’s the type of complementary player that I could see GM Barry Trotz showing some interest in him and that’s in the range that some think Basha will land in.
jminn: Do you think Carter Yakemchuk is NHL-ready or does he need AHL seasoning?
Offensively, I think Yakemchuk could hold his own in the NHL next season and that’s a compliment. His shot is a considerable weapon and he doesn’t hesitate to get involved in the rush; that’s something teams could work with. Physically, he has a frame where he might be able to stick as well. But on the whole, no, I don’t think he’s ready to play at the top level just yet.
One of the big knocks on him is his skating. That’s something that pro teams will exploit pretty quickly. In general, his defensive game needs some work. Part of that can be fixed with skating improvements but he needs reps against easier competition to start developing some better habits on that end. I think he’d be overwhelmed if exposed to NHL-level players on an extended basis. Most blueliners would; there’s a reason why there are very few 18-year-old defenders in the NHL.
I’ll also clarify that Yakemchuk isn’t eligible to play in the AHL next season. As a CHL-based player, it’s NHL or bust for him. He’s not eligible to play in the minors on a full-time basis until 2026-27. Unless his defensive game and skating improve considerably over the next couple of years, he could certainly benefit from time in that level as well to shore up that side of his game before getting regular NHL minutes. That’s a pretty standard development curve for most rearguards and I think it’s probably the best one for him as well.
@SamToo22: Where does Trevor Zegras end up?
One of the challenges of finding the right fit for Zegras (if he’s moved at all) is trying to figure out what it is they want. I expect they’ll be active in free agency again this summer as they look to add veteran pieces to help position themselves toward moving past their rebuild. But having said that, it would surprise me if they were interested in moving Zegras for that veteran type of piece; I think they’ll want someone (or something) with considerable club control. That takes some potential suitors off the table.
On the flip side, having been rebuilding for basically six years now, a strictly futures-based return probably isn’t going to fly either. Sure, a high draft pick could be part of a package but there needs to be someone that isn’t years away from being an impact NHL player. This element might not reduce any suitors but it puts more limitations on the types of offers that could be made.
Montreal has been suggested as a possible fit. They’ve moved younger players and draft picks at the last couple of drafts for more win-now help and they have a fairly deep prospect pool and some young roster players that could be appealing. If he went there, it wouldn’t surprise me.
But my pick is Utah. It’s the same general idea as Montreal in that they have a draft pick surplus, a strong group of prospects, and some younger roster pieces that can help Anaheim in the near future. Like many, I expect Utah to take a swing or two this summer and go after someone like Zegras who is young enough that he can be a part of the younger core group they already have. They certainly could use some help down the middle and an influx of offensive talent so if Zegras winds up moving, Utah is my guess at a landing spot.
Gmm8811: So let’s talk about CapFriendly… where are we gonna go now to find that kind of information? Maybe your site will expand its content? Also, any updates on what is going on with the players involved in the Hockey Canada mess?
jminn: Why didn’t the NHL buy CF? Daly and his chimp sleeping at the wheel.
Losing cap sites is something I’ve been accustomed to over the years. I remember about 20 years ago when there weren’t any sites but rather a mailing list with an Excel spreadsheet (which took quite a while to get onto, might I add) that had contract info but not cap tracking. Teams have taken over cap sites before and we’ve been fortunate enough to have new ones pop up quickly. Fortunately, we don’t have to wait for a new one this time as PuckPedia has been up and running for several years now. Meanwhile, as Josh Erickson noted in a reply to this question in the callout, we are looking into some options as well but obviously there’s nothing to report on that front.
As to why the NHL didn’t take over the site, they are steadfastly against salary disclosure. I remember Gary Bettman saying in the past that he didn’t think there was much demand for this information; it came a day or two after the cap site at the time crashed due to too many visitors putting too much strain on the site’s server. We’ve learned since Washington’s purchase was announced that the league wasn’t too thrilled about the existence and popularity of CapFriendly so the last thing they were going to do was amplify it by folding it into their own site. If anything, I suspect there were some cheers from the league office when it came out that a team was buying it and getting CapFriendly out of the public domain.
Meanwhile, regarding the Hockey Canada situation, TSN’s Rick Westhead relayed last week (Twitter link) that a trial date won’t be set until mid-August while the earliest a trial could happen would probably be April 2025 and that the proceedings could take at least two months. Accordingly, there isn’t going to be much news on that front for a while yet.
frozenaquatic: IMHO Panthers hockey is boring hockey. It’s not the clutch-and-grab of the Brodeur Devils but the dump-and-chase-and-hem-them-in game is boring to watch. There are barely any breaks, barely any numbers going each way. The fact that Connor McDavid is a non-factor in the series is basically the worst thing for the NHL. Is there any possibility the NHL will make any rule changes based on the dullness that they tried to steer away from with trap-game 2000s-era hooking amendments? Or are we to endure teams trying to emulate the Cats’ game? Are we doomed to playoff hockey where 12 shots against per game is the norm?
I can’t see the NHL making any rule changes based on a couple of series in the playoffs. They – and by extension, the Competition Committee – have to look at the bigger picture and look at the whole season when pondering any changes. In general, this season resembled a lot like recent years with a lot of faster-paced action and while the goals per game were down, it was only slightly and was still the third-highest number since 1995-96. I don’t see them coming in with any rules to drastically change offensive freedom as a result.
What they’ll probably do is what they always do, find a way to remind the officials to call the type of slow-down infractions that occur highly frequently in the playoffs that helps Florida (and other gritty teams) play the way they do. That will result in the usual ‘crackdown’ early on with an uptick in power plays and then gradually go back to normal before it picks back up in the playoffs.
You might have some cause for concern about teams trying to emulate what the Panthers are doing. This is a copycat league, after all, and with Florida being a bit more of a bigger and physical team, I could see a greater emphasis being placed on those elements at the draft and in this offseason. But these things ebb and flow every so often so I don’t expect Florida’s playoff success to kickstart a return to the more defensive, grind-it-out style from past decades.
aka.nda: Who is in the DoPS and why is the most consistent thing about their work its unpredictability?
The NHL doesn’t publicize all members of the Department of Player Safety beyond its head which is long-time NHL enforcer George Parros. Former NHL players Brendan Shanahan and Stephane Quintal preceded him as the league is clearly looking to rely on the opinions of those who have played the game to help shape disciplinary decisions.
As to the consistent inconsistency, so to speak, it’s due to the fact there are few absolutes on a play. Let’s say there is a suspendable hit to the head. There isn’t anything cut and dry that says an illegal check to the head is worth x number of games. So now they have to look at the other elements.
Was it intentional? Was it in retaliation to something else? Was the head the principal and sole point of contact or was there body contact as well? Is the player a repeat offender? (And so on.) You can apply similar types of questions to the other suspendable infractions as well. Now factor in that not everyone will see it the same way (fans and DoPS members alike). How many times have we seen a suspension where some think it’s too light and others didn’t think it was a penalty let alone suspension-worthy? I’m pretty sure there are similar discussions in the league office as well.
These are all mitigating or aggravating factors and when you start taking that many elements into play, you wind up with a lot more subjectivity than you’d probably like. These are going to keep being judgment calls and that means it’s going to continue to be unpredictable, even if they were to put some sort of minimum baseline suspension for a particular infraction in place.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
